What are the chances of seeing a Laughing Falcon in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Laughing Falcon sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 94 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 93rd most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Laughing Falcon in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
February–March, May and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Laughing Falcon in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against about 10% in January, April and June–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Laughing Falcon?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Laughing Falcon sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Laughing Falcon?
8th of 65
Of the 65 parks where we can rate Laughing Falcon sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Emas National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Laughing Falcon live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same family: Falconidae
The closest relatives of the Laughing Falcon that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (family Falconidae, Falcons and Caracaras) are Black Caracara (about 40%), Bat Falcon (about 10%) and Red-throated Caracara (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Laughing Falcon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Laughing Falcon is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (94 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.