What are the chances of seeing a Laughing Falcon in Emas National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Laughing Falcon sighting in Emas National Park on a given day, based on 48 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 92nd most-seen of the 187 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Laughing Falcon in Emas National Park?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Laughing Falcon in Emas National Park on a given day, against about 10% in September and November, the lowest months. That is one of Emas National Park's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 190 mm in January. April and December–February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Laughing Falcon?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Laughing Falcon sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Emas National Park the best place to see a Laughing Falcon?
Among the best
Of the 65 parks where we can rate Laughing Falcon sightings, Emas National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Laughing Falcon live in Emas National Park?
Same family: Falconidae
The closest relatives of the Laughing Falcon that you can see in Emas National Park (family Falconidae, Falcons and Caracaras) are Crested Caracara (about 70%), Aplomado Falcon (about 60%) and American Kestrel (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Laughing Falcon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Laughing Falcon is recorded against all the birds logged in Emas National Park (48 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.