What are the chances of seeing a Piratic Flycatcher in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher sighting in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, based on 235 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 102nd most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Piratic Flycatcher in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
February–July and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, against under 5% in August and October–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Piratic Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Parque Natural Metropolitano the best place to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
34th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Piratic Flycatcher sightings, Parque Natural Metropolitano ranks 34th at about 10%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher live in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher that you can see in Parque Natural Metropolitano (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 80%), Common Tody-Flycatcher (about 30%) and Social Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Piratic Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Piratic Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Parque Natural Metropolitano (235 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.