What are the chances of seeing a Piratic Flycatcher in Palo Verde National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher sighting in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 253rd most-seen of the 274 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Piratic Flycatcher in Palo Verde National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher in Palo Verde National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Piratic Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Palo Verde National Park the best place to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
60th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Piratic Flycatcher sightings, Palo Verde National Park ranks 60th at under 5%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher live in Palo Verde National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher that you can see in Palo Verde National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 70%), Tropical Kingbird (about 60%) and Brown-crested Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Piratic Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Piratic Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Palo Verde National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.