What are the chances of seeing a Social Flycatcher in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Social Flycatcher sighting in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 824 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 22nd most-seen of the 297 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Social Flycatcher in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
April to June
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Social Flycatcher in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against about 40% in February–March, July–September and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Social Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Social Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celestún Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Social Flycatcher?
20th of 68
Of the 68 parks where we can rate Social Flycatcher sightings, Celestún Biosphere Reserve ranks 20th at about 50%. The best odds are in Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 70%), Masaya Volcano National Park (Nicaragua, about 70%) and Cañón del Sumidero National Park (Mexico, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Social Flycatcher live in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Social Flycatcher that you can see in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 60%), Vermilion Flycatcher (about 30%) and Common Tody-Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Social Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Social Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (824 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.