What are the chances of seeing a Piratic Flycatcher in Chagres National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher sighting in Chagres National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 273rd most-seen of the 372 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Piratic Flycatcher in Chagres National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher in Chagres National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Piratic Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chagres National Park the best place to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
51st of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Piratic Flycatcher sightings, Chagres National Park ranks 51st at under 5%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher live in Chagres National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher that you can see in Chagres National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet (about 50%), Tropical Kingbird (about 40%) and Scale-crested Pygmy-Tyrant (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Piratic Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Piratic Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Chagres National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.