What are the chances of seeing a Bananaquit in Chingaza National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit sighting in Chingaza National Natural Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 135th most-seen of the 258 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bananaquit in Chingaza National Natural Park?
March and May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit in Chingaza National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and June–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bananaquit?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bananaquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chingaza National Natural Park the best place to see a Bananaquit?
53rd of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Bananaquit sightings, Chingaza National Natural Park ranks 53rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 90%), Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 90%) and Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (Mexico, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bananaquit live in Chingaza National Natural Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Bananaquit that you can see in Chingaza National Natural Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Scarlet-bellied Mountain-Tanager (about 80%), Masked Flowerpiercer (about 60%) and Rufous-browed Conebill (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bananaquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bananaquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Chingaza National Natural Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.