What are the chances of seeing a Bananaquit in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 484 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 35th most-seen of the 325 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bananaquit in Manuel Antonio National Park?
July and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, against about 20% in January–June and August–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bananaquit?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bananaquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Bananaquit?
37th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Bananaquit sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 37th at about 20%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 90%), Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 90%) and Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (Mexico, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bananaquit live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Bananaquit that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Scarlet-rumped Tanager (about 50%), Palm Tanager (about 40%) and Blue-gray Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bananaquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bananaquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (484 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.