What are the chances of seeing a Laughing Falcon in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Laughing Falcon sighting in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, based on 123 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 74th most-seen of the 436 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Laughing Falcon in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Laughing Falcon in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, against about 10% in February–March, July and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Laughing Falcon?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Laughing Falcon sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amacayacu National Natural Park the best place to see a Laughing Falcon?
Among the best
Of the 65 parks where we can rate Laughing Falcon sightings, Amacayacu National Natural Park ranks 5th at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Emas National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Laughing Falcon live in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Same family: Falconidae
The closest relatives of the Laughing Falcon that you can see in Amacayacu National Natural Park (family Falconidae, Falcons and Caracaras) are Black Caracara (about 20%) and Red-throated Caracara (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Laughing Falcon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Laughing Falcon is recorded against all the birds logged in Amacayacu National Natural Park (123 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.