What are the chances of seeing a Bat Falcon in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Bat Falcon sighting in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 289th most-seen of the 436 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bat Falcon in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
January–February and June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bat Falcon in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and July–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bat Falcon?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bat Falcon sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amacayacu National Natural Park the best place to see a Bat Falcon?
39th of 64
Of the 64 parks where we can rate Bat Falcon sightings, Amacayacu National Natural Park ranks 39th at under 5%. The best odds are in Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 40%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 30%) and Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Bat Falcon live in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Same family: Falconidae
The closest relatives of the Bat Falcon that you can see in Amacayacu National Natural Park (family Falconidae, Falcons and Caracaras) are Black Caracara (about 20%), Laughing Falcon (about 20%) and Red-throated Caracara (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bat Falcon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bat Falcon is recorded against all the birds logged in Amacayacu National Natural Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.