What are the chances of seeing a Lineated Woodpecker in Manu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lineated Woodpecker sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 554 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 116th most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lineated Woodpecker in Manu National Park?
March, May and July
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lineated Woodpecker in Manu National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April, June and August–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lineated Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lineated Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Lineated Woodpecker?
16th of 68
Of the 68 parks where we can rate Lineated Woodpecker sightings, Manu National Park ranks 16th at about 10%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 40%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 30%) and Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Lineated Woodpecker live in Manu National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Lineated Woodpecker that you can see in Manu National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Yellow-tufted Woodpecker (about 30%), Crimson-crested Woodpecker (about 20%) and Fine-barred Piculet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lineated Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lineated Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (554 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.