What are the chances of seeing a Bananaquit in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 44 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 190th most-seen of the 418 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bananaquit in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
January and April–May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and June–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bananaquit?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bananaquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a Bananaquit?
48th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Bananaquit sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 48th at under 5%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 90%), Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 90%) and Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (Mexico, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bananaquit live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Bananaquit that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Palm Tanager (about 50%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 40%) and Silver-beaked Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bananaquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bananaquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (44 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.