What are the chances of seeing a Short-tailed Hawk in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Short-tailed Hawk sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 862 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 183rd most-seen of the 503 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Short-tailed Hawk in Arenal Volcano National Park?
May, July and September–March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Short-tailed Hawk in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June and August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Short-tailed Hawk?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Short-tailed Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Short-tailed Hawk?
23rd of 71
Of the 71 parks where we can rate Short-tailed Hawk sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 23rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 30%), Everglades National Park (United States, about 20%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Short-tailed Hawk live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same genus: Buteo
The closest relatives of the Short-tailed Hawk that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (genus Buteo, Buteos) are Gray-lined Hawk (about 20%) and Broad-winged Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Short-tailed Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Short-tailed Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (862 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.