What are the chances of seeing a Bananaquit in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit sighting in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge on a given day, based on 924 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 12th most-seen of the 329 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bananaquit in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge?
April and September
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Bananaquit in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge on a given day, against about 30% in May, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Bananaquit?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bananaquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge the best place to see a Bananaquit?
12th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Bananaquit sightings, Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge ranks 12th at about 50%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 90%), Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 90%) and Arrecifes de Cozumel National Park (Mexico, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bananaquit live in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Bananaquit that you can see in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Scarlet-rumped Tanager (about 50%), Variable Seedeater (about 40%) and Blue-gray Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bananaquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bananaquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge (924 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.