What are the chances of seeing a Social Flycatcher in Los Quetzales National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Social Flycatcher sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 113 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 132nd most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Social Flycatcher in Los Quetzales National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Social Flycatcher in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Social Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Social Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a Social Flycatcher?
66th of 68
Of the 68 parks where we can rate Social Flycatcher sightings, Los Quetzales National Park ranks 66th at under 5%. The best odds are in Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 70%), Masaya Volcano National Park (Nicaragua, about 70%) and Cañón del Sumidero National Park (Mexico, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Social Flycatcher live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Social Flycatcher that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Mountain Elaenia (about 50%), Tufted Flycatcher (about 30%) and Black-capped Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Social Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Social Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Los Quetzales National Park (113 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.