What are the chances of seeing a Common Sandpiper in Manas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Sandpiper sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 176 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 377 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Sandpiper in Manas National Park?
February and November–December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Common Sandpiper in Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June and September, the lowest months. Those are among Manas National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 1070 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Common Sandpiper?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Sandpiper sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see a Common Sandpiper?
60th of 109
Of the 109 parks where we can rate Common Sandpiper sightings, Manas National Park ranks 60th at about 10%. The best odds are in Sundarbans National Park (India, about 80%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 60%) and Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Sandpiper live in Manas National Park?
Same family: Scolopacidae
The closest relatives of the Common Sandpiper that you can see in Manas National Park (family Scolopacidae, Sandpipers and Allies) are Green Sandpiper (about 10%) and Common Snipe (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Sandpiper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Sandpiper is recorded against all the birds logged in Manas National Park (176 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.