What are the chances of seeing a Blue-black Grassquit in Manu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-black Grassquit sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 416 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 163rd most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-black Grassquit in Manu National Park?
March
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-black Grassquit in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and July, the lowest months. That is one of Manu National Park's wettest months, with about 250 mm of rain against 60 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-black Grassquit?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-black Grassquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Blue-black Grassquit?
23rd of 73
Of the 73 parks where we can rate Blue-black Grassquit sightings, Manu National Park ranks 23rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Emas National Park (Brazil, about 70%), Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 50%) and Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blue-black Grassquit live in Manu National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-black Grassquit that you can see in Manu National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Silver-beaked Tanager (about 50%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 40%) and Red-capped Cardinal (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-black Grassquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-black Grassquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (416 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.