What are the chances of seeing a Blue-black Grassquit in Tambopata National Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-black Grassquit sighting in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, based on 77 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 331st most-seen of the 550 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-black Grassquit in Tambopata National Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-black Grassquit in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-black Grassquit?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-black Grassquit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tambopata National Reserve the best place to see a Blue-black Grassquit?
54th of 73
Of the 73 parks where we can rate Blue-black Grassquit sightings, Tambopata National Reserve ranks 54th at under 5%. The best odds are in Emas National Park (Brazil, about 70%), Serra da Canastra National Park (Brazil, about 50%) and Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blue-black Grassquit live in Tambopata National Reserve?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-black Grassquit that you can see in Tambopata National Reserve (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Silver-beaked Tanager (about 40%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 20%) and Palm Tanager (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-black Grassquit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-black Grassquit is recorded against all the birds logged in Tambopata National Reserve (77 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.