What are the chances of seeing a Roadside Hawk in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Roadside Hawk sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 283 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Roadside Hawk in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
October
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Roadside Hawk in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against about 10% in September, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Roadside Hawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Roadside Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Roadside Hawk?
9th of 77
Of the 77 parks where we can rate Roadside Hawk sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 9th at about 40%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 70%), El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 60%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Roadside Hawk live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Roadside Hawk that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Plumbeous Kite (about 30%), American Swallow-tailed Kite (about 20%) and Slate-colored Hawk (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Roadside Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Roadside Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (283 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.