What are the chances of seeing a Dusky-capped Flycatcher in Los Quetzales National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dusky-capped Flycatcher sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 22 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 181st most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dusky-capped Flycatcher in Los Quetzales National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dusky-capped Flycatcher in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Dusky-capped Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dusky-capped Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a Dusky-capped Flycatcher?
69th of 71
Of the 71 parks where we can rate Dusky-capped Flycatcher sightings, Los Quetzales National Park ranks 69th at under 5%. The best odds are in El Triunfo (Mexico, about 50%), Cañón del Sumidero National Park (Mexico, about 40%) and Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (Mexico, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Dusky-capped Flycatcher live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Dusky-capped Flycatcher that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Mountain Elaenia (about 50%), Tufted Flycatcher (about 30%) and Black-capped Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dusky-capped Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dusky-capped Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Los Quetzales National Park (22 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.