What are the chances of seeing a Common Pauraque in Serra da Canastra National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Pauraque sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 51 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 164th most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Pauraque in Serra da Canastra National Park?
February, June and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Common Pauraque in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Common Pauraque?
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Pauraque sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Common Pauraque?
24th of 69
Of the 69 parks where we can rate Common Pauraque sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park ranks 24th at about 10%. The best odds are in Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 30%), Emas National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Common Pauraque live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same family: Caprimulgidae
The closest relatives of the Common Pauraque that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (family Caprimulgidae, Nightjars and Allies) are Least Nighthawk (about 10%) and Scissor-tailed Nightjar (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Pauraque sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Pauraque is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (51 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.